By 
Some stakeholders have raised concern and expressed opposition to reports that the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) planned to remove the official mark from ballot papers for the 2026 General Elections.
Citizens First Spokesperson, Dalitso Tembo, said any move that weakened electoral safeguards or undermined public confidence in the electoral process must be opposed.
In a statement issued in Lusaka on Wednesday, Tembo said the official mark on ballot papers had, over the years, served as a critical security and verification feature designed to protect the integrity of the vote and prevent electoral malpractice.
She said that at a time when Zambia required enhanced transparency, stronger electoral security, and greater stakeholder confidence, any decision to remove such a safeguard was ill-advised and risked generating unnecessary suspicion, tension, and mistrust among citizens and political actors.
“Citizens First firmly believe that electoral reforms must strengthen — not dilute — the credibility of elections,” Tembo stated.
She emphasized that any changes to ballot design or electoral procedures should be anchored in law, subjected to broad stakeholder consultation, and clearly justified in the public interest.
Tembo urged the ECZ to immediately clarify its position, engage political parties and stakeholders transparently, and refrain from implementing changes that may compromise the perceived or actual integrity of the electoral process.
Similarly, People’s Pact Vice President for Strategy, Peter Sinkamba, said that although some reforms were noted, several provisions introduced significant vulnerabilities that could be exploited to undermine the will of the voters.
Sinkamba said the official mark was a primary security feature that prevents “ballot stuffing” by distinguishing legitimate ballots from pre-marked or counterfeit ones.
“Removing it makes it impossible to distinguish between a legitimate ballot issued at the station and a fraudulent one,” he argued.
Sinkamba further noted that the Bill introduced an “adoption certificate,” defined as a document signed exclusively by the Secretary-General of a political party to sponsor a candidate.
He stated that the certificate would be required for all nominations except those for independent candidates.
“This centralizes absolute power in one individual. If a Secretary-General is compromised by the ruling party, they could unilaterally refuse to sign certificates for popular opposition candidates, effectively disqualifying them before a single vote is cast,” Sinkamba said.
He argued that the removal of the official mark and the centralization of candidate adoption were retrogressive steps that threatened the credibility of the 2026 General Election.
Meanwhile, Development People’s Party (DPP) leader, Dr. Kafula Mubanga, also opposed the proposed amendment which sought to “revise the voting procedure by the removal of the use of the official mark.”
“The ‘official mark’ (traditionally a holographic seal, watermark, or specialized stamp) is the primary safeguard against electoral fraud,” Mubanga said.
He warned that without a unique, physically verifiable official mark applied at the polling station, it became impossible to distinguish between a legitimate ballot paper and a sophisticated photocopy or pre-printed counterfeit.
He added that security features also provided psychological assurance to voters, and that their removal created a perception that the system was being “loosened” to allow illicit ballots into the count.
“We demand the retention of the official mark and propose the introduction of QR-coded serial numbers or UV-sensitive ink to modernize, rather than remove, ballot security,” Mubanga said.
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express permission from ZAMBIA MONITOR.
Comments