By 
The arrest of US-based Zambian blogger, Ethel Chisomo Edwards, has reignited debate over how far governments should go in policing online speech, as questions grow about the balance between regulation and fundamental freedoms.
Edwards, 42, originally from Kangwane Village in Chief Chizela’s area of North-Western Province, was taken into custody on allegations of seditious practices, hate speech, and libel.
Police spokesperson, Rae Hamoonga, confirmed that the charges stem from a series of videos allegedly containing inflammatory and defamatory remarks directed at President Hakainde Hichilema, members of his family, and public figures including photographer Chellah Tukuta and Judith Kabemba.
She now faces five counts related to the offences.
Her arrest marks the latest in a string of high-profile cases targeting Zambian bloggers and digital commentators.
In May this year, the Lusaka Magistrate’s Court sentenced social media influencer and businessman, Elias Musyani, to six months’ imprisonment and fined him K70,000 after being found guilty of cyber-harassing Kidist, the wife of artiste Elton Mulenga, popularly known as Yo Maps.
Musyani was convicted under Zambia’s cyber laws for harassment using electronic communication.
Analysts warn that Edwards’ case could deepen debate over how Zambia enforces cyber and libel laws in an era when diaspora activists increasingly use social media to engage in domestic politics.
Online critics argue that aggressive state responses risk setting precedents that chill broader civic engagement online.
As more African governments tighten controls on digital spaces, Zambia’s handling of Edwards’ case is being watched beyond its borders as part of a wider continental test: how to regulate online speech without eroding fundamental freedoms.
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express permission from ZAMBIA MONITOR.
Comments